Thursday, 23 March 2017

Tuesday, 21 March 2017

Meditations on the Rosary

Fr Angelico of the Dominicans of Avrille was kind enough to distribute the following meditations. We have formatted them, converted it into a downloadable pdf for easy printing and added the Litany of Humility ourselves. Please make use of them this Lent.

Who is the true follower of Archbishop Lefebvre?

Please watch these two videos. The first is Conflict Zone, where a hostile journalist attacks a cringe inducing Bishop Fellay about his beliefs. Compare this with the latter interview with Bishop Williamson (by an admittedly friendly journalist who is very obviously naive about Church issues) where the Bishop gives very different answers to similar questions asked of Bishop Fellay. Who is the true follower of Archbishop Lefebvre?

Conflict Zone

Bishop Williamson

Monday, 20 March 2017

Father Patrick de la Rocque on a proposed deal.

As a result, without venturing into satire, it would be indispensable to question Pope Francis on the content of his Faith, before even considering if a canonical recognition were opportune or prudent. Because the Divine Will cannot require us to place our eternal salvation in the hands of someone who does not profess the Catholic Faith. To establish legal unity without real unity would, incidentally, be contradictory. This is undoubtedly what Archbishop Lefebvre had in mind when he said in Fideliter magazine after the 1988 episcopal consecrations: “If I live a little longer and, supposing that in some time from now Rome calls me, [..] I would raise the question to the doctrinal level: 'Are you in agreement with the great encyclicals of all the Popes who have preceded you? Are you in agreement with Quanta Cura of Pius IX, Immortale Dei and Libertas of Leo XIII, Pascendi of Pius X, Quas Primas of Pius XI, Humani Generis of Pius XII? Are you in full communion with these Popes and with their affirmations?' [...] The positions would thus be clearer”.

Tuesday, 14 March 2017

Magnificat Media call it right again.

Francis is simply bringing to its logical conclusion the revolutionary concepts brought into the Church at the Second Vatican Council. He is simply following in the footsteps of his immediate predecessors, both of whom promoted ecumenism and indifferentism during their Pontificates. The only difference is that Francis has his foot all the way down on the accelerator and the car is going 88mph instead of 55. The only question that remains now is: Who will rebuke Peter to his face and speak against this abominable event? Will a Traditional Bishop stand up for the rights of God and condemn this odious act? Or will Tradition remain silent, under the claim of being prudent?”

Sunday, 12 March 2017

Wonderful News

I had not planned to post over Lent, but the wonderful news is that Fr Gerardo Zendejas will become the third Bishop Consecrated by H.E Bishop Richard Williamson on May 11th.
To learn more about the thinking of Fr Zendejas please download the zip file below for a compilation of his sermons.

Saturday, 18 February 2017

In their own words

At this crucial moment in the history of the fight between Tradition and Modernism, it is important to get one's facts right. That is why we have linked to the chronology of betrayal on Non-Possumus and here to an excellent collection, without commentary, of the most important documents that were available up until the end of 2012. For those available since that time please go to the Non-Possumus link.

Wednesday, 15 February 2017

Saturday, 11 February 2017

A chronology of betrayal

Occasionally one can forget the chronology of events that have tragically led the SSPX to their current position. Not only that, but when attempting to persuade those of good will who are still supportive of the Fraternity of the actions of its leaders, one needs evidence of what these people have actually said. Therefore massive credit must go to Non-Possumus  for the chronology below which importantly links to the original words of those quoted.

Thursday, 9 February 2017

The Gnocchi/Citati debate

Superb letter from journalist Alessandro Gnocchi on the SSPX agreement and his demolition of the response by the SSPX

"The other objectionable argument used by Monsignor Schneider is the accusation of little or no supernatural sense thrown against those who oppose the embrace with modernist Rome. It falls here in the usual totalitarian vice of discrediting those who think differently, the "dissident," who, as soon as he lacks the fundamental requirements to express himself, has to be silent.."
Original Italian taken from Non-Possumus